Directory coverage
Live numbers from the current build. These refresh every deploy.
414
BC strata firms tracked
Across 65 cities. Sourced from BCFSA, PAMA, SPABC, and the legacy StrataWatch directory. Merged and deduplicated.
89%
with active BCFSA licence
367 of 414 firms. The remainder are pending verification or have licence-status data from a secondary source we haven't re-confirmed.
100%
geocoded on the map
414 of 414 firms have street-level or city-level coordinates. Addresses missing from source data cannot be mapped.
35%
multi-source confirmed
145 firms appear in at least two of our source registers (BCFSA + PAMA, PAMA + SPABC, etc.). Stronger signal than single-source listings.
Where firms come from
Directory sources, in descending order. A firm can appear in multiple sources.
- BCFSA: regulator, primary source
- 368 firms
- PAMA: Professional Association of Managing Agents
- 50 firms
- SPABC: Strata Property Agents of BC
- 98 firms
- StrataWatch: legacy BC directory
- 113 firms
StrataWatch-only listings carry a thinner signal. Every profile shows its attribution so you can weigh the evidence.
Proxy-signal tests
The monthly data we collect on firm behaviour, not what firms tell us about themselves.
—
Median first-response time
Pipeline starts Q3 2026. Non-identifying test inquiries sent to each firm's published contact channel; time to first substantive reply logged. Surfaces on company profiles as e.g. "Responded in 3h · tested Apr 2026."
—
Accepting-new-clients rate
Pipeline starts Q3 2026. Every firm called monthly and asked whether they're accepting buildings under 30, 30–75, 75–150, or 150+ units. Drives match shortlisting.
—
Small-building-friendly signal
Pipeline starts Q3 2026. Inferred from public portfolio data where >50% of a firm's buildings are under 40 units. Cross-checked against small-strata Google reviews.
Match-flow outcomes
How requests convert, in aggregate. We publish these once volume clears the threshold where individual councils couldn't be identified from the numbers.
—
Requests with 1+ qualified match
Pending · First 30 days. Percentage of intake submissions that produce at least one firm willing to take the building and meet on a proposal conversation.
—
Median qualified matches per request
Pending · First 30 days. We target 2–3 per request. Below that, either the building is hard to place or we need more firms in that size band accepting new clients.
—
Average time to first human response
Pending · First 30 days. Claim: one business day for crisis / switch; two business days for everything else. Will publish the actual distribution once we have it.
—
Request volume by building type
Pending · First 30 days. Aggregated counts by building type and size band. Published when N > 10 per bucket so no individual council is identifiable.
What we commit to
If a stubbed metric stays stubbed past its start date, we'll say why. If a number here is wrong, we correct the page and keep the source references current. If a metric trends badly (response times creeping up, match rate dropping), we publish it anyway. Steady numbers lie more often than moving ones.